ACADEMICIANS' VIEWS ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING: ONLINE DISTANCE-LEARNING VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE INSTRUCTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37536/ej.2024.32.2448Keywords:
Arabic, University Distance Education, English, Foreign Language Teaching, Covid-19 PandemicAbstract
The objectives of this study are to examine the challenges faced by academics teaching foreign languages (Arabic and English) via distance education, in comparison with face-to-face instruction; and to suggest strategies and solutions for managing the challenges and difficulties encountered in an online-teaching platform. The recent Covid-19 pandemic provided a real life lab experiment from which to glean information and draw lessons from, given that online distance learning was primarily utilized during the pandemic to facilitate uninterrupted education. Accordingly, 77 academics providing foreign language education remotely during the pandemic were interviewed. These interviews were conducted in the fall semester of the 2022-2023 academic year. The survey questions were developed by the authors, based on established methods. Open-ended questions were developed as an online data collection tool, and data were obtained with a semi-structured interview form (aptly named "The problems faced by instructors teaching foreign languages in Arabic and English during the Covid-19 pandemic"). This study employed a qualitative research method and utilized a phenomenological design that was structured based on this research method. This technique is based on the idea that teaching should be functional, and that the degree of efficacy with which specific learning functions are achieved should be observable and subject to evaluation. The findings of this study suggest that face-to-face education is more effective than distance education, with regard to learning functionality. However, the study also finds that combining online distance learning with face-to-face instruction (i.e. hybrid teaching) appears to elevate learning functionality to an even greater extent. With regard to distance learning alone, the most common problem experienced and thus the greatest perceived challenge to educators was a lack of student interest and motivation. Additionally, assessment and evaluation of student performance in online environments were found to be not sufficiently accurate. The consensus opinion of the survey respondents is that hybrid teaching approaches offer greater effectiveness with regard to both the stimulation of student-interest and more accurate assessment of student performance.
References
Akyavuz, E. K., & Çakın, M. (2020). Opinions of School Administrators on the Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Education. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44140
Altıparmak, M., Kurt, İ. D., & Kapıdere, M. (2011). Open Source Learning Management Systems in E-Learning and Distance Education. XI. Academic Informatics Congress, 4(5), 320-321, 4(5), 320-321.
Atak, M., & Atik, I. (2007). The Importance of Continuing Education in Organizations and Its Effect on the Process of Creating a Learning Organization. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 3(1), 63-70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281411913_Orgutlerde_surekli_egitimin_onemi_ve_ogrenen_orgut_olusturma_surecine_etkisi
Başaran, M., Doğan, E., Karaoğlu, E., & Şahin, E. (2020). A Study on the Effectiveness of Distance Education as a Benefit of the Coronavirus (Covid-19) Pandemic Process. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 368-397. http://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1220329
Belousova, A., Mochalova, Y., & Tushnova, Y. (2022). Attitude to Distance Learning of School children and Students: Subjective Assessments of Advantages and Disadvantages. Education Sciences, 12(1), 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010046
Bennani, S., Maalel, A., & Ben Ghezala, H. (2022). Adaptive Gamification in E‐learning: A Literature Review and Future Challenges. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 628-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cae.22477
Bilgiç, A. & Tüzün, H. (2015). Problems Encountered in Web-Based Distance Education Programs of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 1(3), 26-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/3028/42071
Boyadzhieva, E. (2014). Theory and Practice in Foreign Language Teaching-Past and Present. USA: Journal of Modern Education Review, 4(10), 776-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/10.04.2014/006
Casacchia, M., Cifone, M. G., Giusti, L., Fabiani, L., Gatto, R., Lancia, L., ... & Roncone, R. (2021). Distance Education during COVID 19: an Italian Survey on the University Teachers’ Perspectives and Their Emotional Conditions. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02780-y
de Amorim, L. M., Júnior, J. G., Neto, M. L. R., Lima, N. N. R., AraújoTeixeira, S., & de Sousa Moreira, J. L. (2022). Reflections on early childhood education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 65, e26-e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.12.031
Dilman, H. (2022). Evaluation of Foreign Language Teaching via Distance Education by Teachers During the Covid-19 Pandemic. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Research, (31), 1434-1461. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1222302
Dogan, Y. (2008). The Effectiveness of Activity-Based Studies in Improving the Listening Skills of Primary School Seventh Grade Students. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 261-286.
Duran, H., (2008). The Position of Teacher and Student Roles vis-à-vis New Educational Technologies, Journal of Turkish World Research, issue 126, p. 109-120, Turkish World Research Foundation, Istanbul 2008.
Duran, H., (2009), Eğitim Okul ve Şirket, İstanbul Journal Of Sociological Studies, İssie 40, sh. 1-24, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iusoskon/issue/9505/118813
Emeksiz, B. (2006). Motivation Measurement in Foreign Language (English) Teaching, Master's Thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul.
Eroğlu, F., & Kalaycı, N. (2020). Evaluation of Distance Education Application of Foreign Language Course, One of the Compulsory Common Courses in Universities. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 18(1), 236-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.37217/tebd.683250
Ersoy, A. (2016). Fourth grade students' perception and experiences of tolerance: A phenomenological research. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal, 12(1).https://hdl.handle.net/11421/14579
Ezginci, Y. (2020). Online Survey Application During the Pandemic Process. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8, 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.36306/konjes.822007
Geray, C. (2007). Distance Education in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Policies, 1(1), 33-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-935-9.ch208
Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A. & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381
Kaymas, S. (2023). Rethinking the Role of Cultural Policies for the Creative Industries Ecosystem in the Shadow of the Pandemic. Dokuz Eylül University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 25(2), 678-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1246681
Kıraç, K. (2020). Method and Aftermath in Foreign Language Teaching: After 2020. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 6(2), 680-691.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/intjces/issue/59193/780879
Marangoz, M., & Özen, E. K. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic Process on Digitalization in Different Fields: A Conceptual Evaluation. Hittite Journal of Economics and Politics, 1(1), 54-68. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hepdergi/issue/69044/1094457
Masalimova, A. R., Khvatova, M. A., Chikileva, L. S., Zvyagintseva, E. P., Stepanova, V. V., & Melnik, M. V. (2022, March). Distance Learning in Higher Education During COVID-19. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 120). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
Moreno, J. M., & Gortazar, L. (2020). Escolarización en confinamiento: Experimento natural y prueba de esfuerzo. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 24(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i2.15540
Murphy, S. (2020). Music Marketing in The Digital Music Industries–An Autoethnographic Exploration of Opportunities and Challenges for Independent Musicians. International Journal of Music Business Research, 9(1), 7-40. https://musicbusinessresearch.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/volume-9-no-1-april-2020-final.pdf
Özdemir, E. A. (2006). Reasons for the Popularization of English Language Learning in Turkey. Mersin University Faculty of Education Journal,2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/efd.02193
Özer, B. & Korkmaz, C. (2016). Factors Affecting Student Success in Foreign Language Teaching. EKEV Academy Magazine, (67), 59-84. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/6618
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
Reimers, F., Schleicher, A., Saavedra, J., & Tuominen, S. (2020). Supporting the Continuation of Teaching and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Oecd, 1(1), 1-38. https://pdf4pro.com/view/supporting-the-continuation-of-teaching-and-learning-71a156.html
Serhan, D. (2020). Transitioning from Face-to-Face to Remote Learning: Students' Attitudes and Perceptions of Using Zoom during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 335-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148
Siddiqui, S., Hossain, E., Ferdous, R., Arifeen, M., Rahman, W., Masum, S., ... & Gegov, A. (2022). A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Diagnosis Based on X-Ray Images. In Smart and Sustainable Technology for Resilient Cities and Communities (pp. 163-174). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Solak, H. İ., Ütebay, G., & Yalçın, B. (2020). Comparison of Distance Education Students' Exam Success in Printed and Digital Environment. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 6(1), 41-52. https://hdl.handle.net/11421/24966
Taşabat, S. E., Oğuz E., Kayaoğlu, G. I. T., & Ersen, M. (2023). A Research on University Students and Academicians' Perspectives on Distance Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Data Science, 6(1), 15-33.
Telli, S. G., & Altun, D. (2020). Coronavirus and the Unstoppable Rise of Online Education. Journal of University Research, 3(1), 25-34.http://dx.doi.org/10.32329/uad.711110
Tümen Akyildiz, S. (2020). College Students' Views on the Pandemic Distance Education: A Focus Group Discussion. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 322-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.150
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education: All Means all. 92310038.
Weggen, C. C., & Urdan, T. A. (2000). Corporate E-Learning: Exploring a New Frontier. WR Hambrecht and Co. Microsoft Word - E-learning2-28-00completewebversion.doc (mior.ca), Access Date: 10.09.2023
Yağan, S. A. (2021). University Students' Attitudes and Opinions Towards Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Academic Platform Journal of Education and Change, 4(1), 147-174. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1785693
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
Yıldız, E. (2020). Examining the Factors Affecting the Sense of Community of Distance Education Students in Online Learning Environments. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 180-205. doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.9m
Zhong, B. L., Luo, W., Li, H. M., Zhang, Q. Q., Liu, X. G., Li, W. T., & Li, Y. (2020). Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Towards COVID-19 among Chinese Residents during the Rapid Rise Period of the COVID-19 Outbreak: a Quick Online Cross-Sectional Survey. International journal of biological sciences, 16(10), 1745. https://www.ijbs.com/v16p1745.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Encuentro Journal
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.