This is an outdated version published on 2021-05-06. Read the most recent version.

Limitations of “only-immigrants” classrooms in the socialization and acquisition of the L2: the case of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) in the USA.

Authors

  • Diana Valero Universidad Antonio de Nebrija
  • Carmen Elboj-Saso Universidad de Zaragoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37536/LYM.12.2.2020.1029

Keywords:

Immigrant students; socialization; socioemotional wellbeing; inclusion; L2 acquisition; homogeneous grouping; heterogeneous grouping.

Abstract

The academic results of immigrant adolescent students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) are still lower than those of their peers (Klein and Martohardjono 2008). In order to bring the voices of the students to the search for better educational solutions, this research focused on how the SLIFE Latinos perceive the homogeneous grouping in relation to their opportunities to learn the L2 and to build social relationships. Following the communicative methodology, 36 communicative stories of daily life with Latino SLIFE students were achieved and the inclusive and exclusive elements that influence their learning of the language of instruction were identified. The findings reveal the perspectives of students and their families on how their daily experience with exclusively homogeneous school groups limited their opportunities to learn and use English and to build social relationships, both inside and outside the classroom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aubert, Adriana, Molina, Silvia, Shubert, Tinka y Vidu, Ana. 2017. “Learning and inclusivity

via Interactive Groups in early childhood education and care in the Hope school,

Spain. Learning”. Culture and Social Interaction, 13. 90-103.

doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.03.002

Ansalone, George. 2010. “Tracking: Educational differentiation or defective strategy”.

Educational Research Quarterly, 34:2. 3-17.

Boyson, Beverly Ann y Short, Deborah. 2003. Secondary school newcomer programs in

the United States Santa Cruz (CA): Center for Research on Education, Diversity &

Excellence, University of California.

Bruner, James. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cavanagh, Sean. 2008. “Keeping track: Structuring equality and inequality in an era of

accountability”. Teachers College Record, 110:3. 700-712

Chang, Mido, Singh, Kusum y Filer, Kimberly. 2009. “Language factors associated with

achievement grouping in math classrooms: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study”.

School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20:1. 27-45.

DeCapua, Andrea, y Marshall, Helaine W. 2010. “Students with Limited or Interrupted

Formal Education in US Classrooms”. Urban Review. 42:2. 159–73.

DeCapua, Andrea, Smathers, Will y Tang, Lixing Frank. 2007. “Schooling, interrupted”.

Educational Leadership, 64:6. 40-46.

Elboj, Carmen y Niemelä, Reko. 2010. “Sub-communities of Mutual Learners in the

Classroom: The case of Interactive groups”. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15:2. 177-189.

Fitch, Frank. 2003. “Inclusion, exclusion, and ideology: Special education students’ changing

sense of self”. The Urban Review, 35:3. 233-252.

Flecha, Ramón, Vargas, Julio y Dávila, Andrés. 2004. “Metodología comunicativa crítica

en la investigación en ciencias sociales: la investigación Workaló”. Lan Harremanak.

Revista De Relaciones Laborales. 11. 21-33.

Freeman, Yvonne S., David E. Freeman, y Mercuri, Sandra. 2002. “Keys to success for

bilingual students with limited formal schooling”. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(1):

-213. doi:10.1080/15235882.2001.10162790

García, Ofelia, Kleifgen, Jo Anne y Falchi, Lorraine. 2008. From English Language

Learners to Emergent Bilinguals. Equity Matters. Campaign for Educational Equity,

Teachers College. Columbia University.

Gómez, Aitor. 2019. “Science With and for Society Through Qualitative

Inquiry”. Qualitative Inquiry. doi: 10.1177/1077800419863006

Gómez, Aitor, María Padrós, Oriol Ríos, Liviu Mara y Tepora Pukepuke.

“Reaching Social Impact Through Communicative Methodology. Researching

With Rather Than on Vulnerable Populations: The Roma Case”. Frontiers in

Education, 4:9. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00009

Hallinan, Maureen T. 1994. “School Differences in Tracking Effects on Achievement”.

Social Forces. 72. 799–820.

Hallinan, Maureen T. 1996. “Track Mobility in Secondary School”. Social Forces 74.

–1002.

INCLUD-ED. 2009. Actions for success in schools in Europe. European Commission,

Directorate-General for Research. 6th Framework Programme for Research –

Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-based Society. Obtenido de:

https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/reunamo/article/INCLUDED_actions%20for%2

success.pdf

Johnson, David. W., y Johnson, Roger T., Holubec, Edythe. 1994. The nuts and bolts of

cooperative learning?. Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.

Kagan, Spencer. 1986. Cooperative learning and sociocultural factors in schooling. En

Beyond language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority students,

ed. por California Department of Education, 231-298. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation,

Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles.

Klein, Elaine y Martohardjono, Gita. 2006. Understanding the student with interrupted

formal education (SIFE): A study of SIFE skills, needs and achievement. New York:

New York City Department of Education.

Lave, Jean, y Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral

Participation (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives)

Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Li, Wei y Zhu, Hua. 2013. “Translanguaging Identities and Ideologies: Creating

Transnational Space Through Flexible Multilingual Practices Amongst Chinese

University Students in the UK”. Applied Linguistics, 34:5. 516-535.

Lightbown, Patsy y Spada, Nina. 2006. How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Long, Michael. 1985. “Input and second language acquisition theory”. En Gass, Susan M.,

and Carolyn G. Madden. Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA:

Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Long, Michael. 1996. “The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition”.

En Handbook of second language acquisition, ed. por Ritchie, William, y Tej

Bhatia, 413–468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Mackey, Alison, y Goo, Jaemyung. 2007. “Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis

and research synthesis”. En Conversational interaction in second language acquisition,

Alison Mackey (Ed.), 407–452. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mackey, Alison, Gass, Susan y McDonough, Kim. 2000. “How do learners perceive interactional

feedback?” Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 22. 471–497.

Martín Alonso, D. y Blanco García, Nieves. 2018. “Indagación narrativa sobre los factores

que favorecen el éxito escolar en estudiantes en situación de riesgo”. Qualitative

Research in Education, 7:3. 335-358. doi:10.17583/qre.2018.3640

Mendelsohn, Alan L., Huberman, Harris S., Berkule, Samantha B., Brockmeyer, Carolin

A., Morrow, Lesley M. y Dreyer, Bernard P. 2011. “Primary care strategies for promoting

parent-child interactions and school readiness in at-risk families the bellevue

project for early language, literacy, and education success”. Archives of Pediatrics &

Adolescent Medicine, 165:1. 33-41.

Menken, Kate. 2013. “Emergent bilingual students in secondary school: Along the academic

language and literacy continuum”. Language Teaching, 46. 438-476.

Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin, y Everett, Bobbie J. 2008. “Neotracking in North Carolina:

How high school courses of study reproduce race and class-based stratification”.

Teachers College Record, 110:3. 535-570.

Olsen, Laurie y Jaramillo, Ann. 1999. Turning the Tides of Exclusion: A Guide for

Educators and Advocates for Immigrant Students. Oakland: California Tomorrow

Plonsky, Luke y Gass, Susan. 2011. “Quantitative research methods, study quality, and

outcomes: The case of interaction research”. Language Learning, 61:2. 325-366.

Portes, Alejandro y Rumbaut, Rubén G. 2001. Legacies: The story of the immigrant

second generation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Robson, Graham. G. 2015. “The Relationship between WTC and Oral Proficiency

Measurements in the Study Abroad Context”. International Education Studies, 8. 12-56.

Rolstad, Kellie, Mahoney, Kate S. y Glass, Gene V. 2005. “Weighing the evidence: A metaanalysis

of bilingual education in Arizona”. Bilingual Research Journal, 29:1. 43-67.

Ruiz de Velasco, Fix, Jorge y Michael. 2000. Overlooked & Underserved. Washington

D.C.: The Urban Institute.

Seedhouse, Paul. 2004. The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation

analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Short, Deborah. 2002. “Newcomer programs: An educational alternative for secondary

immigrant students”. Education & Urban Society. 34:2. 173.

Slavin, Robert. 1991. “Synthesis of Research of Cooperative Learning”. Educational leadership.

:5. 71-82.

Soderman, Anne y Oshio, Toko. 2008. “The social and cultural contexts of second language”.

European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 16:3. 297-311.

doi:10.1080/13502930802291959

Sordo, Juan. 2019. “Actitudes lingüísticas e identidad étnica en los estudiantes indígenas

migrados a la zona metropolitana de Monterrey”. Lengua y migración. 11:1. 7-30.

Stevens, Robert. y Slavin, Robert. 1995. “The cooperative elementary school: Effects on

students’ achievement, attitudes, and social relations”. American Educational

Research Journal. 32:2. 321-351.

Swain, M. Merrill. 2005. “The output hypothesis: Theory and research”. En Handbook of

research in second language teaching and learning, Eli. Hinkel (Ed.), 471-483.

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tharp, Ronald, Estrada, Peggy, Dalton, Stephanie Stoll y Yamauchi, Lois A. 2000.

Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony.

Boulder. CO: Westview.

Tsiplakides, Iakovos. 2018. “Shadow Education and Social Class Inequalities in Secondary

Education in Greece: The Case of Teaching English as a Foreign Language”.

International Journal of Sociology of Education, 7:1. 71-93.

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language

Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Valero, Diana, Riciardi, Zoila y Ucelli, Paola. 2015. “Students With Interrupted Formal

Schooling (SIFE): Socio-Emotional Project | Final Report” [No publicado].

Valero, Diana y Platja, Teresa. 2017. “Inclusive Immigrant Student Education: Lessons

from the United States, Canada and Australia”. REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal Of

Educational Research. 7:3. 316-338.

Valero, Diana, Redondo-Sama, Gisela y Elboj, Carmen. 2018. “Interactive groups for

immigrant students: a factor for success in the path of immigrant students”.

International Journal of Inclusive Education. 22:7. 787-802.

Valls, Rosa, y Kyriakides, Leonidas. 2013. “The power of Interactive Groups: how diversity

of adults volunteering in classroom groups can promote inclusion and success for

children of vulnerable minority ethnic populations”. Cambridge Journal of

Education. 43:1. 17-33.

Villardón-Gallego, Lourdes, García-Carrión, Rocío, Yáñez-Marquina, Lara y Estévez,

Ana. 2018. “Impact of the Interactive Learning Environments in Children’s Prosocial

Behavior”. Sustainability, 10:2138.

Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, Lev. 1996. El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona:

Crítica.

Zehr, Mary Ann. 2009. “N.Y.C. test sizes up ELLs with little formal schooling”.

Education Week, 28:23. 13.

Published

2021-05-06

Versions

How to Cite

Diana Valero, & Carmen Elboj-Saso. (2021). Limitations of “only-immigrants” classrooms in the socialization and acquisition of the L2: the case of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) in the USA. Language & Migration, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.37536/LYM.12.2.2020.1029